Archive for September 2011

Art History Comparison



Every art is unique in shape, size, quality, style and techniques. Artists work with different materials, colors, textures and periods that influence them as well as their work. Most artists have a motive of what they want to convey to the viewer, whether it is to anger us, put us in awe or just make us question our eyes and perception of art. When Kazimir Malevich painted his Black Square on a White Field he thought this was it and that everyone would get it. Shockingly to him, a lot of people didn’t comprehend the meaning behind many of his paintings or find any in them at all. The two paintings, Joan Miro’s The Birth of the World and Jackson Pollock’s One: Number 31, 1950 give us a similar quest and wonder of what it is the artists are really trying to convey.

Different time periods bring upon various art movements and ideas to artists, sculptors, even writers. Joan Miro was an artist that was influenced by Cubism, Fauvism, Dada and was mostly associated with Surrealism. Surrealism was started by a writer, Andre Breton who wanted to explore the unconscious mind. To do this, artist would take drugs or deprive themselves from food and work from their hallucinations. During Surrealism, artists also did atomic drawing, letting the pencil lead their scribbles and making something appear in the whole mist of it. Surrealism was an art form that did not want to work in a traditional style but was seen as irrational and anti-logical.

Jackson Pollock was also an artist that went up and beyond to create art that was not traditional and was questionable for its logic and meaning. Pollock was an American artist and part of an American art movement, abstract expressionism. The idea of this art movement was all about taking chance and accepting accidents, even though every artist had control of what they were doing. Abstract Expressionism was a post World War II art movement full of tension and anxiety and can be seen through painting like Willem de Kooning Woman I. There was also a sense of freedom and movement in most canvases during this period especially in Pollock’s works.

Joan Miro’s The Birth of the World is oil on canvas that stands about 8feet high by 6.5 feet long. The painting is dark and mainly composed of black, and hints of orange, yellow, blue, and white paint. Miro gives us a clue what the composition is about by giving the canvas a title, The Birth of the World. The title also throws us of and makes us wonder how can this be the birth of the world, is the orange circle a balloon or a sperm? Is the black triangle a symbol of a woman or a kite? The canvas could be a representation of the beginning of the world or maybe the world of new inventions. In the Chipp’s book Miro said that; “For me a form is never something abstract; it is always a sign of something. It is always a man, a bird, or something else. For me painting is never form for form’s sake…” (pg 432). After the First World War, the economy did not flourish well and this painting could be a great example of the dark and hardship new world that had to start from scratch.

Jackson Pollock does not name most of his painting and if he does, he gives then numbers or weird titles that have nothing to do with his vast swirl of lines. Pollock painting is oil and paint on canvas that stands about 9 feet high and 17.5 feet long. Like the Miro painting, it is also composed of dark and few colors; black, white, grays, brown and greens. Instead of just making us look at one spot or form, we have to observe the painting fully from one corner to the other. Pollock’s One: Number 31, 1950 is not a portrait, a still life or a landscape but it is a canvas that is in motion and full of anxiety and heavy paint. The movement in the painting makes me think of nature and massive wind combusting everything together and making it hard for us to see the landscape in it.

Pollock and Miro are artists that were both part of movements that wanted to be distinguished from the rest and aim higher than the legends and movements before them. Pollock’s way of painting became revolutionary and also was seen as true American art since there really was not one art movement that belonged to America until abstract expressionism. Pollock used house paint and different size sticks to compose his works of art. He composed huge canvases that were laid flat on the ground and were stepped and walked on in order reach the whole canvas and create the texture and style that Pollock desired. Jackson Pollock physically stepping onto the canvas in order to create his work makes him part of the canvas.

Miro did not step onto his canvas but his art was also admired by some and seen as true surrealism. When looking at The Birth of the World, the cubism and dada influence are defined by the geometric shapes, lines and the nonsense or surreal images. Like Pollock, Miro also looked like he liked lines but used brush strokes and paint to create them. Miro’s brush strokes are wild and fast as if he was just trying to dirty the canvas before he paints in his figures or objects on it. There are five black horizontal lines at the top left part of the canvas that may be a reference to the dark, night sky. Next to the horizontal lines are five blue vertical lines on the right that may define the days, bring, blue sky. At the bottom left corner of the canvas is a person-like figure with a white head and maybe five long finger-like structures being stretched out. Unlike Pollock’s painting, Miro’s lines have a beginning and an end and do not project the same movement and sense of motion in them. In an interview with Johnson Sweeney in 1947, Miro talks about one of his paintings, The Farmer’s Wife, and how he added the circles and angular lines for balance. He said; “They look symbolic, esoteric: but they are no fantasy. They were put in to bring the picture into equilibrium” (Chipp, pg 432). Even though there are five lines on the three corners of the painting they might be there just for balancing out the canvas instead of having significant meanings.

Jackson Pollock’s line drawings are very whimsical and form a ritual dance almost. The circular lines flow in a musical swirls and in some ways is spontaneous but have a controlling gesture and focus. There is a degree of control and even equality on either side of the all over composition. Pollock said; “I have no fear of making changes, destroying the image, etc., because the painting has a life of its own. I try to let it come through. It is only when I lose control with the painting that the result is a mess. Otherwise there is pure harmony, an easy give and take, and the painting come out well” (Chipp, pg 548). Pollock’s One: Number 31, 1950 is in the harmony that he speaks of even with the thickness and heaviness of the layering in the paint it gives of musical notes.

Miro’s The Birth of the World is composed of lines, circles, triangles and smaller circular dots. The way that the dark parts are painted makes it look like there was charcoal smudged into the canvas and not paint. Until Pollock’s canvas, Miro’s is not an all over composition and does not have a thick layering or dripping process but they still both have equality and well balance compositions. Both artists also share the freedom of letting the canvas do its wonder with the painters only being able to help by feeding it paint. In Pollock’s case, the freedom to work from the unconscious, spontaneous mind is what made his painting a breakthrough and made him eager to mark his territory. For Miro, being hungry and forming hallucinations out of blank walls, seeing things that are not there and projecting them onto the canvas was working with his unconsciousness and great imagination.

Joan Miro’s The Birth of the World and Jackson Pollock’s One: Number 31, 1950 are two big canvases that have numerous similarities. Both artists incorporate lines to their work and try to step away from the traditional ways of working, painting, and creating art. Artists have different reasons for why they do what they do and Pollock and Miro are no exceptions. Pollock saw movement in his work and natural beauty by working with his unconscious mind and adding control and at the same time randomness to his canvas. Miro worked outside the traditional way as well and deprived himself of food, living on figs, in order to achieve the hallucination that would make him want to share with the world. Unlike Pollock’s, Number 1A, 1948 canvas, we do not see the artists using his hands or fingers or adding the color pink. Pollock’s One: Number 31, 1950 painting is tick, web of paint, layered in such a heavy way that certain parts of the canvas still look wet. Miro’s painting on the other hand is not a heavily layered but still has the violently fast brush strokes that show the need to be express. Both artists, Pollock and Miro worked in their time period to create something beyond their fellow friends and succeeded in making us pause and wonder.

German Translation Textbook Review – “German For Reading Knowledge” Hubert Jannach & Richard Korb



Do you have to pass a German translation exam in order to be able to progress farther in your graduate program? There’s plenty of help. Read on for a review of one of the books that has been instrumental in helping countless students pass their exams.

“German for Reading Knowledge” by Hubert Jannach and Richard Alan Korb is my all-time favorite German exam preparation book. Why? It works!

Even the older editions were all excellent, but with the current edition, the authors have outdone themselves.

What I like about it is that if you work through it diligently and get feedback on how you’re doing, you’re pretty much guaranteed to be able to handle just about any German text, even the most convoluted types that you’re bound to encounter.

Jannach’s book is very well put together, has excellent explanations, so you can use it on your own (with SOME guidance and a resource person who’ll review your translations and who’ll explain some of the things that might not be so clear after all).

There are two types of exercises: Individual sentences AND texts. There is actually now an answer key available for the sentences (but not for the texts).

The book does have one drawback, but it’s not too big of a problem. Besides, you can easily work around it.

Well, actually, there are two drawbacks. The first one is that the new edition is kind of pricey. So if money is an issue, you can always get the third edition (which you can get for something like 10 bucks or so online). But I really recommend getting the current edition if at all possible.

And not just for the answer key, but also because they did an excellent job in making the explanations clearer and much more complete than they were before.

And here’s the second drawback if you’re an Art History student, which many students are who have to take German translation exams.

Jannach’s book is NOT specifically written for Art History students, and deals more with science texts.

It does have a few articles on Art History related subjects, but it’s definitely pretty skimpy on specific vocabulary.

Don’t let that bother you. The vocabulary is helpful, but to be honest, since most of you WILL be able to use a dictionary, I expect that you’ll manage.

What’s far more important is that you’ll be able to figure out what’s what in the sentence, and that you’ll be able to handle and take apart long and complex sentences (the favorite kind of German scholars).

And the Jannach book is THE best by far in teaching you how to do that.

You can always get your art history vocabulary from other sources. One possibility: Find a few art history articles to translate. That’ll be good practice anyway.

Your advisor will probably give them to you anyway for practicing, and if not, just ask and he or she will be glad to help. Or look in the library, find some that have been translated into English, and see if you can dig up the original version.

A Brief Book Review – Ross King’s The Judgment of Paris



My college art professor was fond of saying “Steal from everyone, there are no art police”. In a sense he was right and in a sense he was wrong, that is regarding ‘art police’. Throughout history, civilizations have enforced their own standards of acceptability in regards to art…sometimes more rigid, sometime less. Now days standards aren’t so rigid and the modern artist enjoys an extraordinary level of freedom to create and exhibit what he or she will. But there have been many times and many cultures in the past when art was heavily policed, and if you didn’t play by the cultural rules of the day your name was ostracized and your career was jailed.

Paris, France in the mid 1800′s was just such a culture and the novel “The Judgment of Paris” by Ross King is the thrilling account of how a loosely knit band of painters Manet, Courbet, Cezanne, Whistler, Monet and others who would dare to challenge the all powerful art police of the day, the French Academy of the Arts.

“The Judgment of Paris” is the story of the French Impressionist Movement. A more sumptuous written tale of art history you will not find. By following the careers of broad group of French artists in Paris in the late 1800′s, those who played by the rules and those who didn’t… such as the spurned and controversial Manet and the feted, lauded and nationally acclaimed but now forgotten Meissonier, by examining their machinations, and weaving in how their lives would be caught by the politics and events of the time, the suffrage and starvation of Paris under siege by the Prussians, the bloody communal movement, the arrogance of the ruling art academy, the intolerance of citizens when confronted with new art forms, the power-plays of those who would work under the capricious and precarious despot, Napoleon the Third, … author Ross King takes us on a fascinating journey through the emergence of one of the most important art movements in modern history.

As a self-taught painter much of my learning about art history has been through catching the occasional lecture, talking with fellow artists, and skimming through art books whenever I can. I skim because rarely does an art history book grab me as a page-turner. I am happy to report that I have found that rare art history book. “The Judgment of Paris” is much more than a well-written art history book. Here is a juicy complex detailed and nuanced drama about the Impressionists, the art history thriller that must be devoured and savored from cover to cover, like slowly eating a rich layered piece of chocolate cake, wanting it not to end. Luckily when you finish this book there is a second equally delicious read awaiting, King’s “Michelangelo and the Pope’s Ceiling”.